FAQs on HKFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards
The Questions and Answers (Q&As) are developed by the staff of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA). These are informal staff views and do not represent the official views of the HKICPA Council, standard setting committees, HKICPA management or other staff members of the HKICPA. The HKICPA and its staff do not accept any responsibility or liability in respect of the views expressed and any consequences that may arise from any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any materials below. Members of the HKICPA and other users of these materials should read the original text of the HKFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (HKFRS SDS) as found in the HKICPA Members’ Handbook for further reference and seek professional advice when considering the materials below.
We welcome your submissions of questions regarding the implementation issues of HKFRS SDS on the Implementation Support Platform.
The Inaugural Jurisdictional Guide for the adoption or other use of ISSB Standards (ISSB Inaugural Jurisdictional Guide) issued by the IFRS Foundation in May 2024 sets out that the targeted entities for application of the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (ISSB Standards) are publicly accountable entities (PAEs).
As contemplated in the Roadmap on Sustainability Disclosure in Hong Kong (HK Roadmap) published by the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) on 10 December 2024, Hong Kong will prioritise the application of HKFRS SDS by large PAEs under a phased approach with reference to the ISSB Inaugural Jurisdictional Guide. Large PAEs in Hong Kong including listed companies which are Large Cap Issuers (i.e. issuers that are Hang Seng Composite LargeCap Index constituents), as well as non-listed financial institutions carrying a significant weight will fully adopt the HKFRS SDS no later than 2028 through the following means:
(a) Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) will conduct a review in 2027 when the first mandated reports prepared based on its enhanced climate disclosure requirements published in April 2024 (New Climate Requirements) become available. The aim is to launch a public consultation on mandating sustainability reporting in accordance with the HKFRS SDS for listed PAEs using a phased approach, with an expected effective date of 1 January 2028 for the first batch of listed entities.
(b) relevant financial regulators, viz. the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Insurance Authority (IA) and Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA) will conduct sector-specific engagements to determine the approach and timing of adopting the HKFRS SDS for different financial sectors. Subject to stakeholders’ comments and feedback, the target is for financial institutions (being non-listed PAEs) carrying a significant weight to apply the HKFRS SDS no later than 2028.
Until further decisions are made by the relevant authorities and/or regulators, entities preparing sustainability disclosures have the sole discretion to decide whether sustainability disclosures should be prepared in accordance with the HKFRS SDS.
In terms of accounting standards, the requirement for Hong Kong-incorporated companies to apply HKFRS Accounting Standards is derived from three interconnected pronouncements:
(a) Firstly, section 380(4)(b) of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) (CO) states that the financial statements of a company must comply with “the accounting standards applicable to the financial statements”.
(b) Secondly, section 2 of the Companies (Accounting Standards (Prescribed Body)) Regulation (Cap. 622C) specifies that the HKICPA is the prescribed body to issue “accounting standards” as defined in section 357(1) of the CO.
(c) Lastly, the respective Prefaces of the HKFRS, HKFRS for Private Entities and SME-FRF & SME-FRS issued by the HKICPA states that these are the applicable accounting standards for the purposes of section 380(4)(b) of the CO.
As such, relevant entities must apply HKFRS Accounting Standards in the preparation of financial statements from the effective date of the respective standards.
In terms of sustainability disclosure standards (i.e. HKFRS S1 and S2), there are currently no legislative or regulatory provisions requiring entities to comply with the HKFRS SDS. Hence, the application of the HKFRS SDS is voluntary despite the stated effective date of 1 August 2025 until and unless there are legislative or regulatory requirements to mandate their use. The effective date of 1 August 2025 was set to make the standards available for use as and when required.
As a standard setter, the HKICPA’s responsibility is to set standards – the HKICPA has no authority to mandate the use of the HKFRS SDS by any entity. As such, the publication of HKFRS S1 and S2 will not affect any of the existing sustainability or climate disclosure-related rules, guidelines or regulations issued by the HKEX, HKMA, SFC and MPFA amongst others. This is so unless and until the respective rules, guidelines or regulations are changed to require compliance with the HKFRS SDS, the decision for which rests solely with the respective regulators.
In other words, the publication of HKFRS S1 and S2 will have no immediate impact on listed entities, banks, insurers, asset managers or pension fund trustees amongst others as they will continue to make sustainability or climate-related financial disclosures in accordance with the extant rules and regulations laid down by the respective regulators (if any). This means that entities listed on HKEX will continue to follow the extant listing rules, including those relating to the New Climate Requirements until and unless HKEX changes those rules.
Please refer to the HK Roadmap published by the FSTB in December 2024 for more details.
The HKFRS S1 and S2 are fully aligned with IFRS S1 and S2.
Appendix V of the HKEX’s consultation conclusions contains a table that maps the New Climate Requirements under Appendix C2 of the Listing Rules to the requirements of IFRS S2.
There are four main differences between the New Climate Requirements and HKFRS/IFRS S1 and S2. They are summarised in the table below.
Aspects |
Details |
1. Reporting boundary: New Climate Requirements: entities may decide which entities or operations to include in their ESG report. HKFRS/IFRS S1: all entities covered by the consolidated financial statements must be included in the ESG report. [HKFRS/IFRS S1.20] |
The reporting boundaries of the listed issuers’ ESG reports are not required to be the same as their financial statements. They can be determined by the listed issuers themselves, who should provide a narrative that explains the reporting boundaries of the ESG report and describes the process used to identify the entities or operations included in the report.
|
2. Industry-based metrics, including certain specific disclosures for commercial banks, asset managers and insurers on financed emissions [HKFRS/IFRS S2.32 and HKFRS/IFRS S2.29(a)(vi)(2)] |
The disclosure of industry-based metrics is voluntary under Appendix C2. Issuers engaged in asset management, commercial banking or insurance activities are encouraged to refer to and disclose additional information about their financed emissions with reference to HKFRS/IFRS S2.B58-B63. |
3. Separate disclosure of scopes 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the consolidated group from other investees [HKFRS/IFRS S2.29(a)(iv)] |
The disclosure of scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions for the consolidated group and other investees separately is encouraged but not mandatory under Appendix C2. |
4. % of remuneration linked to climate considerations [HKFRS/IFRS S2.29(g)(ii)] |
Under Appendix C2, disclosure of the percentage of remuneration linked to climate-related considerations is not required. |
No. The full alignment relates to IFRS S1 and S2 only and does not extend to any future ISSB Standards. When the ISSB publishes any new standards in the future, the HKICPA will engage with relevant stakeholders to decide on the potential adoption of those new standards in Hong Kong as appropriate.
In deliberating stakeholder comments on the ISSB’s exposure drafts of IFRS S1 and IFRS S2, the ISSB acknowledges that entities have different levels of readiness as well as skills, resources and capabilities to apply the ISSB Standards. In order to make the ISSB Standards truly scalable to cater to different entities’ ability to make sustainability disclosures, the ISSB has introduced two key proportionality mechanisms into the ISSB Standards, namely:
(i) The ‘reasonable and supportable information that is available at the reporting date without undue cost or effort’ mechanism; and
(ii) the ‘skills, capabilities and resources available to the entity’ mechanism.
The concept of ‘reasonable and supportable information that is available at the reporting date without undue cost or effort’ is intended to help entities provide the disclosures required by the ISSB Standards in areas in which there is a high level of measurement or outcome uncertainty. The concept, which has previously been used by the International Accounting Standards Board, will support entities by guiding them to consider information that is reasonably available and by clarifying that they need not carry out an exhaustive search for information.
The concept of ‘skills, capabilities and resources available to the entity’ allows entities to apply qualitative approaches (instead of quantitative approaches) in several instances in IFRS S1 and S2. This concept was introduced to ensure that entities are able to apply the requirements in a way that is proportionate to their circumstances while still providing useful information to investors.
The table below summarises the proportionality mechanisms in IFRS S1 and S2:
|
Information used limited to what is reasonable, supportable and available without undue cost or effort |
Qualitative approaches allowed if an entity lacks skills, capabilities or resources |
Determination of anticipated financial effects |
Yes |
Yes |
Climate-related scenario analysis |
Yes |
Yes |
Measurement of scope 3 GHG emissions |
Yes |
N/A |
Identification of risks and opportunities |
Yes |
N/A |
Determination of the scope of the value chain |
Yes |
N/A |
Calculation of metrics in some cross-industry categories |
Yes |
N/A |
The introduction of proportionality mechanisms in IFRS S1 and S2 is intended to assist entities particularly when the ISSB Standards are first applied. Guidance on key requirements (including illustrative examples) is provided in the ISSB Standards to aid application. These mechanisms are likely to be particularly helpful for those entities that might be less able to comply with the disclosure requirements in the Standards.
The full alignment with IFRS S1 and S2 means that the full range of proportionality mechanisms embedded in the ISSB Standards are available in the HKFRS SDS.
To enhance awareness and understanding of the proportionality mechanisms, the HKICPA has issued two pieces of educational guidance (Two important ideas in IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 to facilitate proportionality and scalability; and Considerations of Skills, Capabilities and Resources in Climate-Related Scenario Analysis) in early 2024 to explain these concepts and the ISSB is in the process of developing further guidance on how to apply these proportionality mechanisms.
*The information in this FAQ is adapted from paragraphs 18 to 23 of the ISSB Inaugural Jurisdictional Guide.
HKFRS/IFRS S1 requires entities to disclose material information about the sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the entity’s prospects (i.e. its cash flows, its access to finance or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term). The definition of material information is aligned with that used in HKFRS/IFRS Accounting Standards—that is, information is material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could be reasonably expected to influence decisions of primary users of general purpose financial reports, including existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors.
In November 2024, the IFRS Foundation issued a comprehensive guide to help entities identify and disclose material information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities. This guide contains examples to illustrate key concepts and support entities in their reporting efforts.
In particular, this guide sets out a process an entity can follow to identify and disclose material information which is closely aligned with the four-step process illustrated in the International Accounting Standards Board’s IFRS Practice Statement 2: Making Materiality Judgements.
The guide also sets out considerations for enhancing the connectivity between sustainability-related financial disclosures and an entity’s financial statements. For those aiming to meet the information needs of a broader set of stakeholders, the guide provides interoperability considerations when applying ISSB Standards alongside European Sustainability Reporting Standards or Global Reporting Initiative Standards.